Friday, June 24, 2011

guggenheim museum new york

images New York City, U.S.A. guggenheim museum new york. New york : Guggenheim Museum
  • New york : Guggenheim Museum



  • pointlesswait
    05-13 10:43 AM
    its not EB2 or EB3..its just desis that are being signalled out!
    it borders on Apartheid..but of a different kind..;-)..(think maan...)
    :cool:
    so to fight this "whatever"..brother.. support IV..;-)



    I and many folks in this forum have seen very few approvals for this category. How come USCIS says that this category is over subscribing the visa quota. Why they are moving un used visas to EB2 (no offense) why not for EB3?

    We need IV help in this area.





    wallpaper New york : Guggenheim Museum guggenheim museum new york. Guggenheim Museum At Night,
  • Guggenheim Museum At Night,



  • kumar1
    08-01 11:07 PM
    Everyone is going to get citizenship .. yes right citizenship by next year.. no GC business.

    Now everybody say "AMEN"

    Very true, I will be a SENIOR CITIZEN pretty soon.





    guggenheim museum new york. New York. The Guggenheim
  • New York. The Guggenheim



  • sunny1000
    02-02 09:37 AM
    Is it not possible to make the copy of the application when you have to sign it? Will the alien # not be there on the application?

    Forgive me for my ignorance..

    I-140 is signed by the employer, not the beneficiary (employee/applicant).





    2011 Guggenheim Museum At Night, guggenheim museum new york. Ceiling of Guggenheim Museum,
  • Ceiling of Guggenheim Museum,



  • java_jaggu
    06-18 11:13 AM
    I have a feeling that they will HAVE To process EAD's in 90 days( that's what the current rule says ) or reinstate the Interim EAD's - terminating Interim EAD seems like the dumbest move they ever made. If either of these doesn't happen, lawsuits are sure to follow. So, don't worry too much about it my friend.



    more...


    guggenheim museum new york. Ceiling of Guggenheim Museum,
  • Ceiling of Guggenheim Museum,



  • sathishav
    03-09 12:24 PM
    Here is the timeline for folks that are not serious

    EB2 India: Waiting for July - October spillovers thinking that most EB2 will be current. The prediction threads have hyped this a lot. Many will benefit this year. But many will miss this bus too. Some from those who will miss this bus, would be back wanting to do something in Nov - May timeframe. Others will waste their time on predictions and trackers and make those site owners rich.

    EB3 India: Many who filed in July 2007 are still happy with EAD status. They worry and contact IV only if their I140 is revoked, I485 denied or if EAD renewal is delayed. Some still sulk or want to blame someone (even IV) for their delays. Those who have not filed I485 yet are few in number. Many new Eb3s still do not know the extent of the backlogs. With time they will slowly learn about the backlogs and wait times. When they suffer due to lack of EAD, they will all make noise on IV asking for some action. This is the reason why the I485 filing action item thread is still weak and pre-mature. I would give another 2 years for the non-I485 folks to have retrogression sink in.

    Retrogression is not going away. If it goes away, only applicants will benefit from it. And these applicants are too weak and small in number to even raise their voice. So why would anyone pass a law to make these people happy that do not even want any law changed. After 2 years all the folks who are not participating in advocacy days and contributing, will contribute to IV. At that time, if we in core are still around, would rather ask them to lead the effort if they can and if they are really serious. The current advocacy day campaign and contributions are a measure of seriousness for us to plan our next agenda items.

    Agree with Pappu.

    We maybe happy now with EAD, but, we never know. Consider this, as per Yates memo

    This memo is just a "interim guidance" and NOT a law. That does not make me very comfy. If it is a law, we can always appeal in court. Not sure about an "interim guidance "

    It also clearly mentions, "this is an interm guidance and the final law can be more restrictive".

    In the Yates memo, the 180 day rule is very Lenient , which many of us interpreted or will interpret in our favor.





    guggenheim museum new york. The Guggenheim Museum in New
  • The Guggenheim Museum in New



  • god_bless_you
    03-28 08:07 AM
    Who ever go for testifying before congress should hightlight the USCIS mis use of VISA numbers during 2004 and 2005 by approving all latest cases and even though there are pending old cases
    so that it will not redo the same in future incase dates move forward??



    more...


    guggenheim museum new york. MUSEUM, NEW YORK,Sotheby#39;s
  • MUSEUM, NEW YORK,Sotheby#39;s



  • jthomas
    09-23 01:36 AM
    I think we should call and tell them that highly skilled legal immigrants are working for long time and the jobs are granted because there is a shortage of highly skilled immigrants in US. We are waiting just because of the inefficiency of USCIS.

    This is from numberusa website on sept 18th with link on the home page.

    H.R. 5882 � "Recapturing Unused Employer-Sponsored Visas"

    This legislation is similar to the measure that Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) used before Summer recess to hijack debate on E-Verify reauthorization. The bill�s sponsor, Immigration Subcommittee Chairman Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif), claims it would �recapture unused employer-sponsored visas� from as far back as 1991 and then add them to the current numerical cap of 140,000 employer-sponsored visas that are available each year. Current law, however, clearly states that any employer-sponsored visas not used in one year are allocated to the family-preference categories in the following year. That means that there are no �unused� visas from past years to �recapture.�

    Moreover, these extra green cards would be for foreign workers to take engineering jobs, health care jobs, construction jobs, manufacturing jobs and just about every other job that Americans have been losing in this economy. In order to qualify, a foreign worker doesn't need more than 2 years of on-the-job training � and they aren't even required to have a high school diploma. Our country doesn't need these workers - our workers need these jobs!



    Another problem i see here....

    this ROY BECK is CEO & Founder of NumbersUSA is doing a backdoor calls directly to Harry Reid to kill this and other bills ....

    Check his Today's Blog

    Link (http://www.numbersusa.com/content/nusablog/beckr/september-22-2008/e-verify-will-die-if-congress-doesnt-act.html)

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has two honorable choices:

    * No. 1: Go around Sen.Menendez who has a "hold" on H.R. 6633, the "clean" E-Verify re-authorization bill passed by the House. Sen. Reid can bring this back-room filibuster to the Senate floor for a vote. If he does this, there easily will be the 60 votes necessary to stop Menendez and allow an overwhelming majority vote to pass H.R. 6633. (Reid reportedly doesn't want to do this because he doesn't want to force some of his Democrats to have to go on record just before the election.)
    * No. 2: Avoid a vote altogether by talking to Menendez privately, persuading him that what he is doing is threatening the reputation of the Democratic Party just before elections and get him to withdraw his "hold" on H.R. 6633. (This way, Reid could then bring H.R. 6633 to the floor in the "hot-wire" fashion which will pass by voice vote.)

    Either way, the American worker and public wins. It is all about Reid doing one of those two things.

    This is why we want you to put particular pressure on Democratic Senators to put an end to Menendez' shameful grandstanding. Fortunately, Senate Republicans are standing firm against Menendez.

    The weakest and most vulnerable American workers -- and non-workers -- will benefit the most from your willingness to step forward and take action this week.

    SEN. MENENDEZ' E-VERIFY BLACKMAIL DEAL

    After we told you that some Republican Senate staffers were working with Sen. Menendez (D-N.J.) for massive increases in foreign workers, you hammered Republican offices for not holding the line for a "clean" E-Verify bill.

    Your efforts really worked. By the end of this last week, Republican Senate staffs were going into negotiations with Democrats and making it clear they were united in oppositiion to a foreign-worker surge at this time of 5-year-high unemployment and financial industry collapse.

    Sen. Menendez apparently is not bothered by the 5-year-high official unemployment rate -- or even by the 292,000 additional American workers who went on unemployment in August alone. He is insisting that if we keep E-Verify, then we have to add another 550,000 foreign workers next year to the 1.1 million immigrants already scheduled to come.

    (AS A REMINDER: E-Verify is the central tool for taking away the job magnet from illegal immigration. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce wants to kill it so outlaw businesses will have more freedom to hire illegal workers. E-Verify is the on-line system that businesses can type into for each new hire and find out if they are an illegal alien.

    (If you live in Arizona, Oklahoma, Georgia -- or any other of the places that have started mandating that businesses use E-Verify -- your efforts to combat illegal immigration will be halted. )





    2010 New York. The Guggenheim guggenheim museum new york. New York City, U.S.A.
  • New York City, U.S.A.



  • perm
    07-01 04:15 PM
    Hi
    I have a I131 (AP) renewal question. My first original AP was issued on Nov/2007. I understand that it expires in 1 year( I do not have the AP doc right in front of me right now). Also I traveled to Mexico in May 08 using AP and was stamped on AP as paroled until May 2009.

    Is there a 120 day rule to file AP renewal (like the one for EAD)? Do I need to file for renewal of AP now (120 day before) or close to May 2009? I have filed for EAD renewal 1 month back and am still waiting for approval, will it cause any problems if I file for renewal while EAD renewal is pending?



    more...


    guggenheim museum new york. guggenheim museum new york usa
  • guggenheim museum new york usa



  • SR2610
    04-03 10:44 AM
    Mr.Bheemi,

    Think twice before you post something on the forum, IV is a volunteer organization and core members are spending their valuable time to do something good for all of us.

    If you think items need to be prioritized, share your thoughts, work with core team, post some analysis which makes sense, etc.

    -SR

    I am suprprised if IV is working towards abiltiy to file 485 and hard country limit...Just want to know how IV is working towards these 2 items...
    If any of these two wont show out in coming bill,..then I would say goodbye to IV..because all other items in bill were there without IV;s interaction....

    Can somebody calrify if these options will anyway include in this bill..by means of ammendements...





    hair Ceiling of Guggenheim Museum, guggenheim museum new york. New York CIty Museum Photos
  • New York CIty Museum Photos



  • LostInGCProcess
    09-05 03:06 PM
    If AOS takes many years, then keep the non-immigrant visa, so that no need to worry about AP.

    You are suggesting how to avoid it rather then try to acknowledge that there is a problem in the wording of AP. By problem, I meant the whole dynamics has changes over the years, so, its time they change to reflect today's reality.

    There may not be everyone who would continue to be on H1 while their AOS is pending.



    more...


    guggenheim museum new york. GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM, NEW YORK
  • GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM, NEW YORK



  • sheela
    09-12 09:14 PM
    and why was it so early. those arseholes carnt even watch a calander right.

    suppose to be on or around the 15th??? which would be friday???

    your language stinks





    hot Ceiling of Guggenheim Museum, guggenheim museum new york. at New York#39;s Guggenheim
  • at New York#39;s Guggenheim



  • franklin
    06-13 11:31 PM
    You can change your signature now - no more waiting:)
    Ha - good point!

    There you go



    more...


    house Guggenheim Museum, New guggenheim museum new york. Guggenheim (New York)
  • Guggenheim (New York)



  • krishmunn
    04-20 10:08 PM
    Looks like you are using online degree to support your case as well, that is why you are so pissed off. No matter how loud you shout or how many people you threaten about lawsuits and all that stuff, no one can deny the fact that an online degree does not have much of recognition.

    Say in clear and simple words -- are online degrees from University of North Dakota, University of Massachusetts, North Eastern University etc. legit ? Yes or No

    Your beating around the bush and twisting words just show you have no argument. Didn't your MBA teach you that there is something called logical argument? Or was your degree from the like of TVU ?

    It is only YOU who think that online degree does not have recognition . If you are yet to understand the power of Online educatoin you are probably living in stone age.


    BTW, I do not have a online degree (though I plan to go for an online MBA) but I am pissed off when I see some so called educated people are so eager to get a GC that they will probably kill others to make their way.





    tattoo The Guggenheim Museum in New guggenheim museum new york. Guggenheim Museum, New York
  • Guggenheim Museum, New York



  • vinodp1978
    06-28 04:30 PM
    my labor has to be pending 365 days or have an 140 approved to extend. so if pp goes away for 140 then my only option to stay in status is EAD. Also I am not in IT so patni,tcs etc...is out of question.



    more...


    pictures MUSEUM, NEW YORK,Sotheby#39;s guggenheim museum new york. Norfast Consulting Group
  • Norfast Consulting Group



  • roseball
    02-06 03:50 PM
    Vinod,

    This is the thread that was created by administrator.

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/forum16-iv-agenda-and-legislative-updates/1059335-announcement-iv-would-like-to-help-with-ac21-cases.html#post1409417

    You can try posting there or you can contact administrator.

    Do keep us in the loop on what happens.

    I would also check if your original GC sponsoring employer (Company A) is not involved in any fraud investigations by USCIS. In which case, USCIS can revoke an approved I-140 without any notice on the basis of fraud, which would automatically lead to your I-485 denial. I-140 online status may or may not change in such cases. Your case being in extended review is raising some flags. Do you know anything about the kind of extended review that was going on. Your lawyer on file, as well as you should get a copy of the notice. Make sure no communication was sent to the lawyer from Company A. Sometimes USCIS does not update the lawyer information even though a new G-28 is submitted. You will have to just wait for the denial notice. Send an email to info at immigrationvoice dot com so IV can get in touch with you to help.





    dresses at New York#39;s Guggenheim guggenheim museum new york. Guggenheim Museum New York
  • Guggenheim Museum New York



  • dba9ioracle
    09-08 01:55 PM
    Do you know many of the deals/contracts are done in a golf course ? That's why your account manager has marketed you with higher rates. Rate is not always based on skill sets.

    You should start playing golf and you can market yourself too..



    more...


    makeup guggenheim museum new york usa guggenheim museum new york. Guggenheim Museum, New
  • Guggenheim Museum, New



  • miguy
    06-18 03:08 PM
    My wife's H4 expires on Oct 1, 2007......We plan to file our I-485 by July 16, 2007.......I am sure it will take atleast 90 days to get her EAD.....whats her status between Oct1,2007 till the time EAD gets approved?......Will she be in valid status during that period?





    girlfriend Guggenheim Museum, New York guggenheim museum new york. Guggenheim Museum New York
  • Guggenheim Museum New York



  • indianindian2006
    10-01 06:27 PM
    If both of you are Indian citizens then your only option is PIO as OCI needs atleast one parent to be a US citizen.





    hairstyles GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM, NEW YORK guggenheim museum new york. Guggenheim Museum, New York
  • Guggenheim Museum, New York



  • lazycis
    07-02 11:37 AM
    I have followed it up with AILF and 3 more attorneys just in case to see if a law suit is feasible. All of them said, it is not possible. Only option left is to write to Dept. of Justice to see if this law holds a constitutional test. I wrote once, but never got any reply on that.

    But if we could take this as a group and mobilise on a mass scale to reach out to DOJ and have them review this INA law we might get attention.

    Couple of points to Nay sayers.. that this is not racial descrimination

    INA even though uses country of birth instead of color of skin It is still considered raical because, Under the same INA, if someone is born in a retro. country and their parents are not from that country, One could use parents country of birth.

    So if a family from UK on a business to India gave birth to a child, this child is not subjected to India limits. Which means this applies only to natives from India.

    I tried explaining this in my writing to DOJ. But one letter didn't do the job required.

    I also think that discrimination lawsuit has very slim chances as the Supreme court ruled in the past that it's OK to have different treatment (discrimination) of non-citizens in immigration matters. But recapture lawsuit may work.





    logiclife
    02-03 06:51 PM
    Thanks and make it a great weekend. Enjoy SUPERBOWL.





    purgan
    10-10 07:42 PM
    For someone from India EB3, this warning is useless. Dates have not progressed for 6 months...

    April 2001 to October 2006.....lets see... the wait is 4.5 years. Even Mexico which send several magnnitudes more immigrants to the US has now moved to May 2001.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment